The Gluttonous Trash Monster: Feast of Forgotten ThingsIn the bones of the city, where alleyways tangle like old cords and neon light fizzles into drifts of steam, there lived a monster nobody admitted existed. It was not the sort of creature that howled at the moon or stalked children from shadowy woods. It was made of discarded wrappers and soggy cartons, of sputtering appliance parts and the damp hair of lost umbrellas — a heap that, with the right kind of hunger, could rearrange itself into limbs and a hunched, peering face. Folks called it, in whispers and on late-night message boards, the Gluttonous Trash Monster.
It arrived quietly, or perhaps it had always been present and only grew large enough to be noticed. The first reports were small: a missing grocery bag, a neighborhood bin unnaturally empty before collection day, the sudden disappearance of a beloved squeaky toy from a stoop. Little things, easily dismissed as the city’s ordinary vanishing acts. But the pattern deepened. Whole corners would smell of old citrus and motor oil, and later a low, resonant munching would ripple through the gutter like a distant tide.
The Monster fed with terrible economy. It preferred what people loved and then forgot — the scarf left on a bus seat after a first date, the polaroid photograph tucked unshielded into a jacket pocket, a recipe scrawled on a napkin. It ate in layers: crisping the edges of memories, softening the smell of a well-worn couch, peeling the laughter from a party hat until only the blank papier-mâché remained. Some nights it gorged on industrial waste and flattened sofas; other times it delicately consumed a locket and an entire poem written in a shaky hand on yellowing stationery.
To watch it was to witness an odd kind of mercy and cruelty. The Monster took what people had abandoned, yes, but it also devoured the remnants of private grief. A candle stub lit in a window for a missing son, folded letters kept in secret drawers, the last braid of a grandmother’s hair — these were the Monster’s delicacies. In doing so it relieved the living of the burden of these tokens, but it also erased them, and for those who preferred remembrance to forgetting, the Monster was an unforgivable force.
Children were drawn to it like moths to a streetlamp. They called it names that made adults frown and scold; they left offerings at the rims of dumpsters, bright things that glittered under sodium lamps. Sometimes the Monster would reciprocate: a child’s lost marble found in the morning under a rusting grate, a book that had slipped from the library cart returned to a stoop with its pages gently splayed. Once, a small dog’s collar — engraved with its name — was spat onto a stoop like a prize. The dog howled, half relief and half confusion, while the monster’s hollow where teeth might be seemed to curve into something like satisfaction.
Newspapers tried to make sense of it, inventing theories to sell papers: an art collective’s elaborate installation, a new wave of environmentally motivated theft, feral animals organizing themselves into a single, terrifying entity. Scientists and city officials arrived with nets and clipboards, though nets proved useless against such a creature and clipboards only gathered the monster’s discarded receipts. Cameras fogged when pointed at it, and the sensors attached to streetside lampposts recorded only static during its feasts. It was as if the city’s instruments were complicit in a forgetting.
There were nights when the Monster’s hunger seemed to be punishment. It would descend on places where people had once gathered and loved and then abandoned those spaces without ceremony: a shuttered diner with coffee rings frozen in time, a playground where swings hung half-broken and rusty, a theatre whose velvet seats smelt of stale applause. The Monster would swallow the evidence whole until only bare beams and ghosts of laughter remained. For some, this was a cleansing; for others, sacrilege.
A little girl named Lina discovered the Monster’s softer side one rain-slick evening. She had been chasing a paper boat when it disappeared into a storm drain. The drain’s mouth was wet and cavernous, and Lina peered in, feeling the throat of the city breathe up at her. A pair of eyes — fashioned from bottle caps — blinked, then the Monster’s hand (if it could be called that) fished the boat up and set it on the curb like an apology. Lina, who had recently lost her father and had been guarding his folded handkerchief like a relic, pressed the boat into the Monster’s sticky palm and asked, in the blunt honesty of children, “Do you eat sad things too?”
For a heartbeat the Monster paused. Then, almost tenderly, it nudged the handkerchief closer to its mouth made of tin tabs and tissue paper. Lina watched, breath held. The handkerchief vanished into layers of map fragments and nylon strings. She felt a stab of fear, then an unexpected lightness, as though the grief had been loosened. The Monster, having tasted something that was not purely waste, trembled and then did something new: it returned a folded scrap of paper from somewhere deep inside — a yellowed photograph of a smiling man beside his daughter, the sun caught on their teeth. Lina took it, slick with garbage-scent, and felt both loss and a strange comfort. The Monster had consumed and, in a way, offered back a piece of memory rearranged.
Stories spread of such exchanges. A woman found, on her doormat, a tiny paper crane folded from a receipt she had used to buy a bouquet on her wedding day — a day she had never shared with her husband, who had left. An elderly man woke to find his pipe returned and a single, unmarked bus ticket tucked inside — the day his wife had vanished from his life seemed a little less onerous, if only because the concrete relic had been restored. The Monster did not simply erase; sometimes it repurposed what it took into small, uncanny gifts.
But there were darker tales. In an upscale apartment, a memory-laden box of letters disappeared overnight. The woman who had kept them spent weeks searching, blaming herself for leaving them on the balcony. Months later, an antique watch — one she believed lost at sea — arrived on the back step, its hands moving precisely at the same time her heart stopped remembering him. The watch’s face bore a smear of something that might have been salt and might have been something worse. The woman’s relief was edged with suspicion: had the Monster granted her consolation on its own terms, or had it used her grief as a course to be devoured?
As winter swelled, the city produced more to feed the Monster. Holiday wrappings, the carcasses of failed resolutions, tinsel and plastic wreaths that browned in stairwells — the Monster feasted like a monarch at banquet. The smell changed: cinnamon mixed with antifreeze, cake with rust. Its shape changed too, growing taller and more grotesque. People whispered that if you left food of your own on the stoop — not trash, but a Sunday roast, say — the Monster might spare your more tender keepsakes. Superstition wove itself through neighborhoods: offerings of cracked china, children’s drawings, and once, a small terrarium left in the snow. Whether any of these rites truly influenced the Monster remained unknown; sometimes they did, sometimes the Monster ignored them and turned, instead, on the things a neighborhood thought it had cleverly protected.
One night, a group of neighbors — drawn less by civic duty than by righteous irritation — tried to trap the Monster. They built a ring of lighted candles, cameras, and a line of garbage trucks waiting like soldiers. They posted live-streams and invited the curious. The Monster arrived as always, carrying the scent of ketchup and old perfume in its breath. For a long, horrible minute the trap seemed to work: the Monster hesitated, its many eyes flickering distantly. Then the candles guttered, the cameras captured only blurred, looping footage, and the garbage trucks refused to start. In the aftermath, the neighborhood felt both embarrassed and relieved; the Monster had walked through the trap and left behind only a single, perfect photograph of the assembled crowd smiling. No one could tell whether it was a taunt or a gift.
Years passed. The city reshaped itself: new construction clawed at old blocks, zoning laws wiped entire streets clean, and with new sanitation efforts, mountains of trash shortened. The Monster adapted. It found new hiding places: beneath the forgotten floorboards of demolished theaters, in the hollow centers of newly built playground slides, within the insulation of cheap apartments. It learned to eat plastic that had a taste like cheap candy, to rip memory from digital devices when people tossed broken phones into curbside bins.
And yet, as the city modernized, the kinds of things people abandoned changed. What was once physical — hand-knit scarves, ticket stubs, pressed flowers — shifted into digital ghosts: unread email threads, deleted messages, cloud albums abandoned after breakups. The Monster, with its appetite for the intimate residue of living, began to manifest more subtle thefts: a family’s online photo album suddenly corrupted; the saved drafts of a novelist disappearing; a playlist that had meant so much to teenage lovers opening to static. Technicians called it a glitch. The Monster, no longer always a figure of torn cardboard and soda cans, had become a rumor that could now move through light and code.
Debate spread across the city: was the Monster a scourge that needed eradication, or a necessary force that kept memory from calcifying into obsession? Some citizens formed a group called The Keepers, dedicated to preserving objects of sentimental value and creating community spaces for remembrance. The Keepers collected items and cataloged them, offering safe storage and, in time, small rituals of release. Others argued that forgetting was healthy, that the Monster provided a bleak yet benevolent service by making space in crowded hearts.
In time, the Monster’s legend wove into the city’s identity. Street artists painted murals of its smiling, scavenged face; indie bands wrote balled verses to the sound of metal scraping metal; local chefs served courses called “the Forgotten” — odd, rescued ingredients mashed into surprising delicacies. Tourism brochures, with a wink, listed “sightings” as attractions. The city learned to live with the creature as it would with a river that floods sometimes and gives rich silt at other times: attend to it, respect its currents, and accept that there will always be places it claims.
On an otherwise unremarkable morning, the city awoke to find that the Monster had thinned. It was not gone; its silhouette still lingered in alleys, and sometimes a bitter scrap of ribbon drifted down from a rooftop like a comet tail. But where it once had pooled into great, rolling hills of debris, there were now narrow pathways and small, organized caches — the Monster seemed to be less of a gorge and more of a careful peck. Speculation ran wild. Had people finally learned to keep their memories carefully? Had the Monster grown content? Or had something else changed inside it — a slow, reluctant shift from consumption toward curation?
Lina, now older and carrying a satchel of her own, walked past a row of bins and paused when a small, folded photograph caught at her eye. It was the same picture the Monster had given her years ago, now frayed at the edges. She picked it up and smiled, feeling the same strange mix of grief and gratitude. Nearby, a new generation of children left tiny boats at drains and small drawings on curbs as offerings, and the Monster, somewhere below the city’s skin, accepted them with an ancient appetite and, sometimes, a return.
In the end, the Gluttonous Trash Monster remained one of the city’s unsolved things: a creature born of waste and memory, of mercy and erasure. It taught the city the difficult art of letting go, whether by offering back fragments of what it took or by swallowing remnants whole. The Feast of Forgotten Things was neither wholly evil nor simply kind; it was complicated, like most of the city’s truths. And like any monster worthy of legend, it reflected, in the shine of its collected tin and in the curl of a stray photograph, the people who made the city — fragile, careless, loving, and always just slightly forgetful.
Leave a Reply