Advanced Techniques for Evolving Creatures in FramsticksFramsticks is a rich artificial life simulator that lets researchers, hobbyists, and educators design, evolve, and analyze virtual organisms with physics, genetics, and neural control. This article covers advanced techniques for evolving creatures in Framsticks, focusing on methods that improve evolvability, robustness, and creativity. It assumes you already know the basics: creating a simple FST (Framsticks text) creature, running simulations, and using the built-in genetic operators. We’ll move beyond the basics into methods that help produce more complex, efficient, and adaptable creatures.
1. Setting clear evolutionary goals and fitness shaping
Evolution needs direction. Defining a clear fitness function is the most important step for any evolutionary run. For advanced experiments, avoid single-objective, static fitness whenever possible.
- Multi-objective fitness: Combine objectives such as distance traveled, energy efficiency, stability, and genome length. Use weighted sums or Pareto optimization to balance trade-offs.
- Shaping and curriculum learning: Gradually increase task difficulty. Start with short, flat terrains and low perturbations; then introduce obstacles, slopes, or variable friction. This helps evolvability by exposing incremental challenges.
- Novelty search and curiosity: Instead of rewarding only task success, reward behavioral novelty (different gaits, trajectories, or morphologies). This prevents premature convergence to simple but brittle solutions.
Practical tip: Begin with a broad reward (e.g., distance) and add secondary rewards (energy efficiency, low damage) after populations show consistent improvement.
2. Encoding strategies: modular and developmental genomes
How you encode morphology and control affects what evolution can discover.
- Direct encoding: Every parameter in the FST is explicitly represented. Simple and interpretable, but scales poorly for complex bodies.
- Indirect encoding / generative grammars: Use procedural rules, L-systems, or graph grammars to encode repetitive or modular structures compactly. Indirect encodings can capture symmetry and self-similarity, making complex morphologies easier to evolve.
- Developmental encodings: Model a growth process where a genome specifies rules for organism development (cell division, differentiation). Developmental systems promote robustness and large-scale coordination.
Example approach: Use a small set of developmental rules that spawn limbs radially, then let evolution tune parameters like limb length and motor placement.
3. Neurocontroller design: from CTRNNs to hybrid controllers
Controller complexity is central to producing sophisticated behaviors.
- CTRNNs (Continuous-Time Recurrent Neural Networks): Good for smooth, oscillatory control required in locomotion. Tune time constants and connection weights for stable rhythmic patterns.
- Central Pattern Generators (CPGs): Hardcode rhythmic modules as primitives, then let higher-level networks modulate phase and amplitude. CPGs simplify evolving locomotion because they embed basic oscillation dynamics.
- Modular controllers: Separate control into perception, pattern generation, and reflex modules. Modular designs make controllers more interpretable and evolvable.
- Hybrid approaches: Combine evolved neural controllers with analytic components (PID controllers for balance, heuristics for reflexes).
Practical tip: Start with a CPG scaffold for locomotion and evolve modulatory connections that adjust gait in response to sensory input.
4. Advanced genetic operators and population management
Standard mutation and crossover can be improved with domain-aware operators.
- Structural mutations: Allow addition/removal of limbs, sensors, joints, or neural nodes. Use probabilities that favor small changes but permit occasional larger innovations.
- Protected crossover: Align similar substructures (modules, limbs) before crossover to preserve functional building blocks.
- Adaptive mutation rates: Increase mutation rates when populations stagnate, decrease as fitness climbs. Self-adaptive mutation parameters encoded in genomes can be powerful.
- Niching and speciation: Maintain multiple niches to preserve diversity. Methods like fitness sharing or explicit speciation (e.g., NEAT-like compatibility measures) prevent loss of novel morphologies.
Population strategies: Use island models (parallel subpopulations with occasional migration) to explore multiple peaks in the fitness landscape.
5. Evaluation robustness: noisy fitness and transfer tests
Avoid overfitting to specific simulation conditions.
- Environmental noise: Randomize friction, terrain roughness, initial positions, and slight variations in gravity or mass. Creatures that perform well across noise are more robust.
- Randomized trials: Evaluate each candidate on several randomized trials and average fitness. For cost reasons, use fewer trials early, more later.
- Transfer tests: After evolving in a simplified environment, test (and further evolve) creatures in more complex or real-world-like scenarios. This can reveal brittleness and guide further selection.
Statistical point: Use confidence intervals for fitness estimates; only consider genotype replacements when improvements are statistically significant.
6. Co-evolution and multi-agent dynamics
Co-evolving agents or evolving agents in interactive settings creates rich behavioral complexity.
- Predator-prey dynamics: Evolve predators and prey simultaneously. Arms races can produce sophisticated sensing, maneuvering, and strategies.
- Cooperative tasks: Evolve teams to perform tasks requiring coordination (carrying objects, maze navigation). Reward group-level performance but monitor for cheating strategies.
- Curriculum via co-evolution: Co-evolution naturally scales difficulty — as one population improves, the other must adapt.
Watchout: Co-evolution can lead to cycling behaviors or loss of gradient; use hall-of-fame archives to maintain past opponents.
7. Fitness landscapes, analysis, and visualization
Understanding the search space helps guide algorithm choices.
- Phenotypic mapping: Project high-dimensional behavior onto 2–3 dimensions (e.g., PCA on gait features) to visualize niches and novelty.
- Fitness landscape sampling: Randomly sample genomes and evaluate fitness to estimate ruggedness, neutrality, and the presence of large neutral networks.
- Lineage and phylogenetic analysis: Track ancestral genomes to see how complex traits emerged and whether convergent evolution occurred.
Tools: Export motion data (positions, joint angles) for offline analysis in Python/Matplotlib or other tools.
8. Hybrid optimization and local search
Combine global evolutionary search with local optimization.
- Lamarckian hill-climbing: After mutation, apply a local search (gradient-free, e.g., CMA-ES or Nelder-Mead) to fine-tune continuous parameters like motor gains or joint stiffness. Optionally write optimized parameters back into the genome.
- Memetic algorithms: Alternate evolutionary generations with local refinement phases to accelerate convergence.
- Parameter tuning: Use automatic algorithm configuration tools (SMAC, BOHB) to optimize hyperparameters for mutation rates, population size, and selection pressure.
9. Practical engineering: simulation speed and reproducibility
Large-scale evolution requires engineering care.
- Parallel evaluation: Use multi-threading or distributed evaluations to scale population sizes and trial counts. Framsticks supports batch runs that can be parallelized.
- Checkpointing and repeatability: Save random seeds, population snapshots, and configuration files to reproduce and continue long runs.
- Profiling: Identify bottlenecks (collision detection, rendering) and disable rendering for large experiments.
File management tip: Store metadata (environment parameters, seed) with every population snapshot.
10. Examples and case studies
- Evolving efficient walkers: Use symmetric indirect encoding, CPG scaffold, and environmental noise to evolve robust biped and quadruped walkers.
- Predator-prey arms race: Co-evolve sensory placement and stealthy morphologies for prey; speed and maneuverability for predators.
- Cooperative transport: Multi-agent evolution with shared fitness for object-carrying tasks, using modular controllers to assign roles.
Conclusion
Advanced evolution in Framsticks is less about a single trick and more about careful combination: clear shaping of objectives, powerful encodings, modular controllers, diversity-preserving population methods, robustness testing, and hybrid optimization. Treat evolution as an experimental science—measure, visualize, and iterate. With these techniques you can push Framsticks simulations from simple walkers to complex, adaptive, and surprising virtual life.
Leave a Reply